<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hot Fuzz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jaaduhai.com/blog/2008/03/16/hot-fuzz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jaaduhai.com/blog/2008/03/16/hot-fuzz/</link>
	<description>khadam tum jahaan jahaan rakho...</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anjum</title>
		<link>http://www.jaaduhai.com/blog/2008/03/16/hot-fuzz/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>Anjum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jaaduhai.com/blog/2008/03/16/hot-fuzz/#comment-415</guid>
		<description>i really enjoyed this movie. Saw it after Shaun of the Dead, which is similar in cinematography style. both are technically good, and.. hmm.. thinking back... yeah Hot Fuzz was not hilariously funny but you know, since when is british humor EVER hilariously funny? its still got somethin' though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i really enjoyed this movie. Saw it after Shaun of the Dead, which is similar in cinematography style. both are technically good, and.. hmm.. thinking back&#8230; yeah Hot Fuzz was not hilariously funny but you know, since when is british humor EVER hilariously funny? its still got somethin&#8217; though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
